Is jessica biel and chris evans still dating dating for males without body hair
She has been with Timberlake since 2007, broke up and then got back together 3 months later. I think the only relationship that needs to be mentioned is her relationship with Timberlake. --GRuban (talk) , 9 September 2011 (UTC) What do you think of the other WP articles on celebrities (I'm guessing that there are over a thousand) that mention dating and relationships?
Are you suggesting that there be a WP-wide policy prohibiting mention of dating/relationships? --Noleander (talk) , 10 September 2011 (UTC) I didn't say that it should be prohibited to mention (!
Single people usually date, and famous people usually date famous people, that's not something we should devote space to.
While I wouldn't immediately strike the section while yelling BLP, I would argue that unless there was something particularly memorable about any of these romances, we shouldn't list them, any more than we would list the clothes she wears or the restaurants she goes to.
Does anyone seriously doubt that Biel has dated Justin Timberlake?
I did not even word the article to say when she dated either of these two or if she was still dating Timberlake.
The material is sourced and GQ is reputable, and they themselves talk about how much coverage her relationships get in the tabliods.
Not wanting to write something that would easily become WP: DATED I deliberately did not make any claims about who she is currently dating just that at some point she has dated them.
Alternatively a better source might be where Biel is mentioned as his real life girlfriend.
-- Horkana (talk) , 14 August 2010 (UTC) Delitionist User: Hullaballoo_Wolfowitz is again asserting what does and doesn't belong without any discussion and conveniently ignoring the fact the material is thoroughly referenced.
Ibanez100 (talk) , 10 September 2011 (UTC)Yes, but how do we determine if a given relationship is sufficiently important for the article? If a several reliable sources comment on a relationship, then it should be in the article. Are you honestly saying that if several of those happen to make inane comments about the same celebrity appearance that it suddenly becomes useful for our article? It's editorial judgment as to what is important and what isn't, and I propose that normal dating, like normal beach going, restaurant going, and clothes wearing, isn't.
But if it were just 1 or two gossip sources, then, no, it doesnt belong in the article. If she dates the pope or a president, yes, because that would be rare.
Search for is jessica biel and chris evans still dating:
That seems significant enough for a mention even if an editor thinks it's worthless garbage.